According to him, on a clean network, packet loss is also less than 1%, which is fine. I'm expecting to be reading out numbers every 100ns, which gives me an order of magnitude higher temporal resolution (100ns vs 2.5 microseconds) than H.E.S.S. had when they first tired the experiment is based on, so losing one or two packets won't neccisarily degrade the signal too much.
If I understand the issue correctly, I may have a workaround for the fact that my embedded processor peripherals don't work. Essentially, it comes down to VHDL being a 'dumb' programming language. Regardless, correcting for this has created a new error (whoohoo) that simply has to do with syntax, and should be resolved shortly.
No comments:
Post a Comment